Best Practices

The Challenge-Driven Innovation programme

Challenge-Driven Innovation is a pioneering R&I funding programme in Europe due to its multidisciplinary, intersectoral and challenge-oriented approach, which has served as a model and inspiration for subsequent initiatives launched by other funding bodies and by the European Union itself.

 

Factsheet
 

  • Geographical scope: Sweden.
     
  • Sources: 

Vinnova

BREITINGER, J. C. et al. (2021): Good practices in mission-oriented innovation strategies and their implementation. Innovation for Transformation - Fostering Innovation to Address Societal Challenges. Results Paper 1. Results Paper 1. Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2021. 

1. Context

An ambitious, cross-sectoral research and innovation policy strategy is essential to future-oriented change. And innovation arises through creativity, dialogue, and diversity of perspectives. So, there is a need for funding instruments that help mobilise new actors and establish long-term interdisciplinary collaborations, enhancing the ability to tackle the societal challenges in the 2030 Agenda.

2. Debate

Challenge-Driven Innovation is an R&I funding programme developed by Sweden’s innovation agency, Vinnova, to fund collaborative projects that work long-term to solve societal challenges. 

To be funded, projects need to fulfil certain characteristics. The idea needs to meet societal challenges with a systems perspective, be innovative and needs-driven, have the potential to create sustainable growth and societal benefits by contributing to the sustainability goals in Agenda 2030, and be designed with a gender perspective. Project consortia must take a problem-oriented approach that involves different disciplines and sectors. The project has to be based on active collaboration between different types of actors and involve those organizations that need to participate in order for it to be successful. These include academia, industry, the public sector, as well as end users, who are the main focus of the programme. Issues such as gender balance in the consortia are also considered by the evaluators.

The programme consists of a three-stage process. Projects are rigorously evaluated between each step and a declining number of projects are selected to receive funding for each subsequent stage. In the first stage, funding is given for the initiation and development of the innovative idea and for planning how it will be developed and used. After evaluation, selected consortia receive funding for a second stage to support collaboration. Participants begin to develop and test the innovative solutions. Finally, some projects are selected for a final third stage that supports implementation, full-scale tests in real environments and demonstrations. This funding model in three stages has several advantages: it gives a larger number of projects the opportunity to secure funding – in the first stage – to develop their ideas, and it makes it easier to bring new stakeholders who had previously not been reached into the collaborations. Many more risks can be taken in the first stage, and as the projects progress to the next stages, they can be further developed and focus on higher quality.

The programme was launched in 2011, and continuous evaluation has led to its refinement and development. The good results produced over time have transformed it from an experimental activity to an established programme, and it has been allocated greater resources. 

3. Conclusions

Vinnova as a whole has changed, largely as a result of the introduction of this programme. The cross-disciplinary, cross-sectoral, and challenge-oriented model introduced by the programme has resulted in new working methods across the agency. A challenge perspective has been embraced throughout the organisation. The range of stakeholders receiving funding from Vinnova has widened from being mainly from industry and research to increasingly including other actors, such as the public sector and civil society organisations. Furthermore, there has been a move from an unspoken focus on technical innovation to a much broader concept of innovation.

Classification

Tags

Subject areas

Related content

El aburrimiento, por Josefa Ros

Josefa Ros, filósofa e investigadora en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, nos desvela conocimientos relevantes sobre una experiencia que todo el mundo ha vivido: el aburrimiento.

How do gender, experience and caseload affect judicial decisions on intimate-partner violence cases?

Are male and female judges equally likely to grant restraining orders in cases of gender-based violence? According to this study, gender alone is not a determining factor but it is a key factor, together with experience and caseload.

Social Research Call

Flash Calls

El café del observatorio

You may also find interesting

Percentage of people who view themselves as above their parents or grandparents on the social ladder

Percentage of people who view themselves as above their parents or grandparents on the social ladder


Some 29% of Spaniards have a social position above that of their parents, and over 40% believe they have risen above their grandparents on the social ladder.

Number of generations necessary so that those born in families with low incomes can reach the average level of income in their society

Number of generations necessary so that those born in families with low incomes can reach the average level of income in their society


In Spain, according to this indicator, it takes four generations to improve the incomes of families with precarious finances.

Fertility rate

Fertility rate


The fertility rate in Spain is 1.23 children per woman, the second lowest rate among European Union countries.